El fallo es un duro golpe para la política comercial del presidente Trump, pero los jueces dejaron los aranceles en vigor por ahora para dar tiempo a una probable apelación ante la Corte Suprema.
By Tony Romm and Ana Swanson
The decision affirmed a lower court’s ruling from March, but was overshadowed by a Supreme Court order that allowed the Trump administration to pursue deportations anyway.
By Zach Montague
The decision is a big blow to President Trump’s trade policies, but the judges left the duties in place for now to allow time for a likely appeal to the Supreme Court.
By Tony Romm and Ana Swanson
But Black student enrollment is lower at the two universities after years of turmoil in elite higher education.
By Troy Closson and Stephanie Saul
The code of conduct for federal judges does not appear to apply to Mr. Bove, who has yet to be sworn in. But his continued presence at the department has raised eyebrows.
By Devlin Barrett
He helped litigate a landmark school desegregation case before the U.S. Supreme Court and overturn wrongful convictions of Black defendants in North Carolina.
By Sam Roberts
The Supreme Court has said the Federal Reserve Board’s independence warrants protection. President Trump’s effort to fire a member will test that commitment.
By Adam Liptak
The conservative majority has been largely receptive to the administration’s claims of executive power.
By Ann E. Marimow
Trump’s effort to oust Lisa Cook could have all sorts of worrisome consequences.
By Kate Shaw
President Trump claimed he has cause to remove a member of the independent board who has not obeyed his demands to vote for lower interest rates.
By Charlie Savage
The annual financial disclosure reported no income as of yet from Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr.’s recently reported book deal.
By Ann E. Marimow
Districts aiming to hire Black teachers, add Black history classes and talk about white privilege are increasingly under scrutiny, raising questions about what is legal, and also what works.
By Dana Goldstein
The president wants to prosecute protesters who desecrate the American flag, but his order concedes that such protests are typically covered by the First Amendment.
By Charlie Savage and Luke Broadwater
In a blunt ruling, the federal judge wrote that he would not thwart Republican lawmakers’ bid to pull Medicaid funds from organizations that perform abortions.
By Zach Montague
Advertisement
The crowning achievement of the civil rights era is unlikely to see its 61st birthday.
By Linda Greenhouse
The Supreme Court has indicated that there are distinctive reasons to shield the Federal Reserve from political interference.
By Adam Liptak
The court’s order was fractured, with the justices splitting over whether individual cancellations and the policy behind them could be challenged in a federal trial court.
By Adam Liptak
An amendment that can help save our democracy.
By David French
It is going to be up to states, the courts and ultimately the American people to stop the president’s attempt to further erode American democracy.
By Richard L. Hasen
A trade group representing sites like Facebook and X said the law ran afoul of the First Amendment.
By Adam Liptak and Zach Montague
The Supreme Court’s conservative majority kicked away the best, even last, chance at a national solution to a national problem.
By David Daley
The president has crowed about the billions of dollars collected so far from tariffs. That money could be at risk if the White House loses the legal battle.
By Tony Romm
A group that represents students sued the military academies over their consideration of race in admissions but dropped its case after the Trump administration rejected diversity initiatives.
By Vimal Patel
Adam Liptak, a New York Times reporter covering the Supreme Court, explains a recent decision by the court on gerrymandering. He spells out how the justices may be poised to eliminate the remaining pillar of the Voting Rights Act.
By Adam Liptak, Alexandra Ostasiewicz, Laura Bult, Stephanie Swart and James Surdam
Advertisement
The justices, having effectively blessed partisan gerrymandering, may be poised to eliminate the remaining pillar of the Voting Rights Act.
By Adam Liptak
The infamous case’s dissent that Lincoln loved.
By Jamelle Bouie
Judge James C. Ho has recast the role of jurist as a vociferous combatant in the culture wars. Could that be exactly what Trump is looking for?
By Mattathias Schwartz
Alvin L. Bragg, the Manhattan district attorney, is asking for more time to decide whether to seek a review of the overturned murder conviction of Pedro Hernandez in the Etan Patz case.
By Hurubie Meko
A lower court had ordered agents not to make indiscriminate stops relying on factors like race or speaking Spanish.
By Adam Liptak
Readers respond to an article about men, women and “mankeeping.” Also: The Supreme Court; separating migrant families.
The administration has become increasingly focused on admissions data in its effort to bring the higher education system in line with President Trump’s political agenda.
By Michael C. Bender and Anemona Hartocollis
The Supreme Court may extinguish a law that more than any other made the promise of American democracy a reality.
By Jamelle Bouie
Its six-member conservative majority has become a key enabler of Trump’s agenda.
By Thomas B. Edsall
Spikes in the number and influence of briefs filed by historians have prompted questions about the role scholars should play in litigation.
By Adam Liptak
Advertisement
Once again, it looks as if Pam Bondi’s Justice Department is attempting to undermine the rule of law.
By Nancy Gertner and Stephen I. Vladeck
The Washington Litigation Group is the latest nonprofit group to join the legal challenges against the president, with a strategy of focusing on appeals early in the case.
By Eileen Sullivan
Speaking at a judicial conference, the justice said that saying too much risked premature judgments, adding that the court had been trying various approaches.
By Adam Liptak
The defiance is coming from inside the judicial branch itself.
By Adrian Vermeule
The guidance protects employees and supervisors seeking to recruit fellow federal workers to their religion. The Clinton White House issued similar guidelines in 1997, though with more caveats.
By Eileen Sullivan
When the court fails to make rulings clear, confusion can set in, and the justices’ credibility can suffer.
By The Editorial Board
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who serves as the institution’s chancellor, has always emphasized procedure and avoided politics. This moment could make that more difficult.
By Abbie VanSickle, Robin Pogrebin and Graham Bowley
A district court judge declared some of the administration’s cuts ‘void and illegal.’
By Abbie VanSickle
The justices paused a lower court order pending a decision on whether the Supreme Court will take up the case, a major challenge to the Voting Rights Act.
By Abbie VanSickle
In remarks before judges and lawyers in California, the justice said she believed the court had a responsibility to share its reasoning.
By Abbie VanSickle
Advertisement
Even as top Justice Department officials brokered an interview with a longtime associate of Jeffrey Epstein’s, they asked the Supreme Court to reject her appeal.
By Abbie VanSickle
The ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit brings the White House’s theory of citizenship closer to a full Supreme Court review.
By Mattathias Schwartz
The court’s order was the latest in a series of emergency rulings on the scope of the president’s power over independent agencies.
By Adam Liptak and Zach Montague
Solo practitioners, former government litigators and small law offices stepped up to help challenge the Trump administration’s agenda in court after the White House sought to punish many big firms.
By Elizabeth Williamson
The round table discusses Trump and MAGA’s very bad week.
By Michelle Cottle, David French, Jamelle Bouie and Alison Bruzek
“The Opinions” round table discusses Trump and MAGA’s very bad week.
Purists are freaking out over her informal locutions, but at least they’re taking notice.
By John McWhorter
We explain a curious type of court case.
By Adam B. Kushner
In a series of terse, unsigned orders, the court has often been giving the green light to President Trump’s agenda without a murmur of explanation.
By Adam Liptak
Trump wants his people calling the shots. And Bove has proved, above all, that he belongs to the president.
By Jeffrey Toobin
Advertisement
The five migrants on the latest flight, all from different countries, were sent to Eswatini, a small nation in southern Africa.
By Hamed Aleaziz
Administration officials have already begun the process of transferring certain functions to other agencies.
By Michael C. Bender
La medida de los jueces representa una expansión del poder ejecutivo, que permite al presidente Trump desmantelar el funcionamiento interno de un departamento gubernamental.
By Abbie VanSickle
In court filings and dismissal letters, the Justice Department’s political leadership claims sweeping authority to fire career law enforcement officials without cause.
By Devlin Barrett
The president may be winning battles to weaken our democracy, but he has not won the war.
By Thomas B. Edsall
David Leonhardt talks with a conservative judge about the courts in the Trump era.
By Michael W. McConnell, David Leonhardt and Jillian Weinberger
The three-judge panel has allowed the case to languish in a kind of legal limbo, catching the eye of some legal experts.
By Alan Feuer
The move by the justices represents an expansion of executive power, allowing President Trump to dismantle the inner workings of a government department.
By Abbie VanSickle
Readers respond to articles about childhood vaccinations and a rise in measles cases. Also: Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s independent path.
Eight men sent by the United States to South Sudan could presage a new approach to Trump-era deportations, even as critics say the practice could amount to “enforced disappearance.”
By Mattathias Schwartz
Advertisement
En la decisión del mes pasado que limita los mandatos judiciales universales, el tribunal pareció invitar a los tribunales inferiores a utilizar las demandas colectivas.
By Adam Liptak
In last month’s decision limiting one judicial tool, universal injunctions, the court seemed to invite lower courts to use class actions as an alternative.
By Adam Liptak
Según sus funcionarios, esta medida es parte de un plan de consolidación que reducirá el exceso burocrático.
By Michael Crowley
At a bar association event in Indiana, the justice told those gathered that she is focused on drawing attention to what is happening to the government.
By Abbie VanSickle
Readers discuss Justice Jackson’s role on the Supreme Court. Also: Church endorsements of candidates; Voice of America, silenced.
A hundred years later, many religious Americans in rural areas still feel that the cosmopolitan leaders of the Democratic Party look down on them.
By Michael Kazin
The Supreme Court lifted a lower court’s ruling that had blocked mass layoffs in the federal work force.
The law, enacted this year, made it a crime for unauthorized migrants to enter the state. Challengers say immigration is a federal matter.
By Adam Liptak
Readers respond to a guest essay by Dr. Allen Frances. Also: A Supreme Court decision on firing federal workers.
The justices announced they were not ruling on the legality of the specific downsizing plans but they allowed the Trump administration to proceed for now with its restructuring efforts.
By Abbie VanSickle
Advertisement
The plan directly contradicted the White House, which last month described as “fake news” reports of plans to re-deport Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia.
By Alan Feuer and Minho Kim
The document from El Salvador seems to undermine a position that lawyers for the Justice Department and top Trump officials have taken time and again in front of a judge in Washington.
By Alan Feuer
The court’s rules require many litigants to submit 40 copies of their briefs, resulting in millions of pages printed each term. Critics call the process outdated and wasteful.
By Adam Liptak
Porn platforms just got what they deserved at the Supreme Court.
By David French
Courts blocked the handover after lawyers raised concerns of torture. Then the Supreme Court intervened to allow the Trump administration’s plan to move forward.
By Mattathias Schwartz and Hamed Aleaziz
In solo dissents this term, the justice accused the conservative majority of lawless bias. On the term’s last day, Justice Amy Coney Barrett fired back.
By Adam Liptak
Advertisement
Advertisement
